Category Archives: Conversations about “drugs” “addiction” & “recovery”

International Overdose Awareness Day-August 27, 2018

I had the opportunity to attend St. Catharine’s Market Square which held an annual vigil in honor of those lives lost to substance overdose. In attendance were politicians, fire/EMS workers, Positive Living/StreetWorks reps and other social service agencies, along with about 70 of us there to remember and pay homage to their loved ones.
There was food and beverages, a memorial section, agency access information, flowers, and a sheet laid out to be signed by those wanting to pen some thoughts and prayers to their loved ones lost. Some survivors spoke of their experiences, a moment of silence was held, politicians said their piece and EMS taught about Naloxone sprays.
Whether it be misadventure, intentional, assisted, bad dope, it doesn’t really matter. What matters is the continued and ever-increasing presence of those loved ones whom care enough to remember, and to act on their lost ones’ behalf to complete even the smallest of acts to help even one lost soul come around, however temporary it may be. A kind, caring act by a complete stranger can have a profound effect on those suffering not only from their substance abuse, but the continuously untreated underlying reasons to use that remain the catalyst for positive change.
Drugs don’t discriminate, aren’t racist, can’t feel, lack emotion, but can silently end your existence without guilt. Be proactive and help your fellow man, it may just be the self-change moment both parties need to feel. THOUGHTS?
Niagara Region.

THE NEW PARADIGM OF RECOVERY; group meeting structure and talking points.

The time has arrived to propose a new sort of community gathering (meeting) in which people with the history of the label “Addiction” can engage in the discussion of ideas. This new sort of meeting under the banner of AddictNoMore bars no one. Users, non-users, recovered, those contemplating abstinence, those using without duress….we need to move beyond barriers between us and realise that users and non-users alike can engage with each-other in supportive conversation so to advance ourselves in our concepts and notions of living well. We would only maintain the only requisite to attendance would be to not be disruptive, nor engage in any substance use during meetings, not to have any substances on person at any meeting (at least keep it to yourself). AddictNoMore does neither support drug use nor judge it as wrong, rather we understand there is nothing intrinsic in a substance that is bad in itself instead it is the context (the sort of relationship one engages with the substance) that is often problematic. That being said the shared social reality is that that drug dependence (especially abuse of harder drugs) will not really get anyone anywhere in the long run but a dead-end (but this is a realisation for the individual to make and if judged upon the individual can only be exacerbating of the problem). So all this being said lets begin.

Group meeting discussion points and general outline;

So basically spend about 10 to 15 minutes on each point, to speak you need to hold the speaking stone which gets handed to to the next person who wants to speak by the person just finishing, everyone sits in a circle facing each other, meeting convenes when at 75 minute point – speaker stone is any item that is useful or handy or if someone can bring some sort of small rock, or a feather, or small branch to pass around to signify it is there turn to speak.

  • expressions of gratitude – members volunteer moments, events they feel gracious for – (example, a kid being born, having a place to meet and talk, finding an old lost friend who is doing well, …. and so on…
  •  is “addiction” a conformist way of using substances? Is addiction a sort of social construction (something that we learnt) that confines people? It it real? In what ways is it real? In what ways is it not real? can drugs be used without dependence? what are other dependencies besides substances? is dependence bad or good?
  •  narratives of recovery – members can volunteer to share their story of moving beyond drug dependence, either via abstinence and, or maintenance…include in your story your low points and high points of using – what changed, what maybe sparked the change, how you changed, what you are happy for and what you could change if you could.
  • is using drugs the only way to get high? why is it we desire to get high? is this a response to a pain, or a void, or is this a natural inclination?
  • to use of not use?
  • what are concrete problems we are experiencing today how can we as a group work concretely to alleviate these problems starting today (this may be about the need for harm reduction for those using, this may be about employment problems – how to find job training and work, how to access continued education, what we can do to sleep better, eat better, pass time better, good books to read, good shows to watch, the need to organise further events such as hikes, picnics, group meditation, exchange of local information for accessing services such as detox, food programs, safe spots to chill, good parks to meditate in or toss a frisbee…)


The idea of AddictNoMore is that the term “addiction” is anachronistic – that the narrative around drugs and addiction has become over-saturated and that it must be abandoned. That rather we need to deal with ourselves as human beings unique in ourselves yet sharing a common source and common destination. We are each each other’s comrade – ultimately the journey in our liberation is intwined in each and one other’s journey. This is about synergy. Only through good synergy can we overcome.

Happy sharing, wish you a great experience,



Finding new paths forward together!

AddictNoMore is grateful for what was another great year of seized opportunities of growth with our sisters and brothers in the regions of Niagara Ontario. Engaged on the front lines of ‘addiction’ and ‘poverty’ (aka disempowerment). We would like to pass on some observations.


Addiction is not a simple issue of ‘drugs’. Just as the criminal-justice approach has shown to only exacerbate the problem, a disease model concept in fact may only be further perpetuating and making a problem worse. It seems the same mechanisms of the construction of deviance are at play with both styles of addressing addiction. Whereas the justice systems punishes drug use with the label of ‘crime’ so the disease model punishes drug taking behaviour with the label/stigma of ‘disease/illness’. Both approaches are simply repressive enforcement of societal norms that actually have no ontological reality to begin with. AddictNoMore challenges the current trend of twitter and facebook parades of mental health style posts in regards to drug use – we maintain that the continued enforcement of the regime of repressive normalcy (to do with human behaviour) and undue socialization of economic, material, and political ideologies only makes problems worse. As Carl Jung wrote ‘dirt is matter in the wrong place, and the more civilized we become the dirtier we get.” It is shameful when social services and good-will organizations both wittingly and unwittingly put forward and advance an oppressive narrative in the name of helping people.

Despite all of our best efforts the war against the suffering and disempowerment around substance use is being lost; it seems the losses are unimaginable. With hard drug use beginning as early as adolescence, young people with no family nor any support network at all are being forced to negotiate substance dependence in an economically, socially, and spiritually ravaged Niagara Region.


AddictNoMore maintains the root of all problematic substance use is ‘disempowerment’. This is when a person finds themselves in a sort of need-state (either material, psychological, or spiritual depravation) but has no real viable means of growth/overcoming. This “absence of means” is today often systematic (with the break-down of the family as our reproductive technology, also economic and social justice issues, but also the failure of organized faiths and their people to deliver and teach transcendental values). As well, the “absence of means” can often be personal (in instances of trauma and abuse). Disempowerment can then be perpetuated by the disempowered themselves, by people having internalized social beliefs that are really oppressive narratives meant to substantiate and legitimize a status quo world that is unjust (a person then can become their own worst enemy). In all such examples however, the one constant is substances. In any case regardless of the differences, ‘drugs’ remain the easy and only available partner to our woes (either street drugs or pharma – and we challenge the thoughts about which are safer). Within our system of profit pursuits, eager capitalists (corporations, cartels) have made available at all levels of society (and at all levels of price) different substances that people can turn to instead of other people, or their own internal psychological resilient strengths and, or spiritual essence and guide.


AddictNoMore suggests the following means to immediately begin to take our people back!

1.Empowerment; via love (unconditional regard, non-judgement and forgiveness). Teaching that defaults are not a result of our individual biology, but a manifestation of blocked paths to growth.

2. Social Power; re-establishing communities that empower their members through horizontal (non-  professional, community based) guidance. Enabling communities through economic resources that include real access to education that is growth orientated. Assisting communities by putting expert knowledge in the hands of community members synonymous to ideas of community and liberation psychology.

3. Transcendental guidance; going beyond tolerance of different beliefs but encouraging people to reconnect with each their own life source and find in it their own heritage, tradition, culture, and truths which can lead the person to an internal state of otherness yet connection – a truly powerful way of being not unlike Maslow’s ideas of peak/plateau experiences and, or mystical experiences chronicled in the writings of Joseph Campbell.


As we close 2017 we leave you with some pictures of good cooking and loving from our local youth shelter. We hope you all a greater and greater understanding for 2018; the idea that the greatest truths are only those that get better by growing.

God bless!


Applying ideas from Liberation Psychology & Critical Psychology to ‘Addiction’.

According to Liberation Psychology ( rooted from Liberation Theology) “our account of justice has to denounce injustice, but must also indicate modes of resistance instead of encouraging complicity.” What does this mean for the realm of ‘Addictions’?

  1. Maybe drug culture itself, drug use, and the template of ‘Addiction’ and ‘Recovery’ are themselves reactive narratives of resistance to both societal and personal/psychological oppression. This is not to disparage drug culture as simply ‘reactive rebellion’, but encourages a view that our external influences (very much social that) have shaped not just the dialogue of laws, drugs and treatments but shaped how we conceptualize such things themselves. For instance does my drug use mean I lack control of body, or suffer a ‘chronic relapsing brain disease’, or does it mean that I symbolically resist bio power, governmentality and common status quo values of consumerism ( maybe on a personal note I am resisting an oppressive parent, or spouse). If this is the case treatment for drug use should instead be no treatment for drug use, and instead be an empowering of the individual to assert themselves as free and powerful agents in society without the necessity of self-defeating modes of resistance.
  2. Regardless of the causes to ‘Addiction’ whether if they be biological, developmental, caused by personal suffering such as trauma, or suffering of sociological oppression (ie. ‘racial’ oppression) – the causes may not be relevant to what will in fact help as a solution. Critical theory would discount the importance of cause and effect medical models as much the product of, and bias of, a Western Discourse. As can be learnt from the story of the rainmaker  in Taoism – sometimes causality has nothing to do with the solution.
  3. Further consistent with critical theory treatment that is overly focused on causality may in fact be adverse – especially along lines of the bio-medical model. For instance the moment that someone is diagnosed they are subjected to a host of relationships in which they are powerless ( i.e., doctor – patient relationship. Suddenly the person diagnosed holds no knowledge of their own condition and is subject to their diagnosis in which medical authorities hold all knowledge, medicines and solution. Such a relationship is itself producing of illness not to mention deeply stigmatizing.
  4. Much  to do with research in drug use and ‘Addiction’ is shaped by common narratives born into the bio-medical mode ( and yes even the bio-social-psyc model) from western, white, upper class, male ideologies of individuality and capitalism. This basically means that much of the research is biased. Biased in its assumption of the individual participant as a basic research unit, that numbers and statistics can represent living realities in truth, and even biased in assuming procedures such as ‘double-blind’ and ‘random’ sampling are purposely accurate. The simpler truths (although they may lack economies of profit) may be more honestly accurate. For example, drug use is natural behaviour and pathological behaviour of drug use is instead a product of the institutions of law and medicine that seek for some reason to eradicate it ( actually they are trying to patent drug use and product it out in a capitalist economy as medicine).

There is much to be read outside of the common thread that can benefit ideas of ‘addiction’, ‘recovery’, but most importantly benefit people who are need of the empowerment by ideas and not substances. For example, ideas about sociology, and social psychology, including ideas of ‘bio power’, ‘constructions of deviance’, ‘inter-group behaviour’, ‘the psychology of social justice’ and as well ‘iatrogenesis’  – all which can shed light on the current dark realities emerging from current statistics on drug use in contemporary society. In light of this conversation return on point with our core mission statement – that is the first of AddictNoMore’s tenant goals; “Unconditional love” – this is our first and most important step.

All the best on your journey!